In an article in The Independent today, entitled ‘We must educate our sons to save our daughters’, Yvette Cooper says this:
“Whore, bitch, slag, slut,” – these are the insults one teacher says she hears levelled at teenage girls on a daily basis. She described girls being “heckled if they dare to speak in class, their shirts forcibly undone, their skirts lifted and held by groups of boys”
She goes on:
No teenage boy should grow up persuaded that abuse is normal, or feeling forced to behave in particular ways to prove their masculinity. For years we have talked about the importance of empowering our daughters, giving them the confidence to challenge abuse and bringing them up as feminists. If we are going to achieve a real-step change in tackling violence against women, we need our sons growing up as confident feminists too.
So, the message is, boys need to stop being boys and embrace feminism. OK, right.
It’s a neat conflation of normal human behaviour (and I don’t mean acceptable behaviour, just commonplace human behaviour) with feminist ideology, and then using that to impose a political ideology, feminism, on boys that is actually about subduing them and the men they will become.
Rabid ideologues, like Cooper see everything through their feminist lens. They unashamedly demonise boys, whilst setting girls up as unimpeachable victims – which they are not of course, as anyone with common sense knows.
Children’s behaviour is children’s behaviour. Children need to be educated to become adults, with appropriate rules for good social conduct. Both sexes need to learn how to be good citizens and you do not achieve that by coercing them into better behaviour: and you certainly don’t achieve it by indoctrinating them into a political ideology whilst they are children and unable to make informed decisions for themselves.
Cooper’s utterances show just how deeply subversive feminism really is. It is a deeply political ideology whose intent is to divide society along the fault-line of gender (and I don’t mean sex – gender in a political sense is the feminist rhetoric), so that it can insert its dogma like a virus into the young and vulnerable, thus exerting its will upon future society, and conforming it to a particular party line. Frankly, this is child-abuse.
Feminism seeks to disrupt our society by setting women against men, which is why Yvette Cooper’s intention is so evil. She and her fellow ideologues want to get feminist ideology into schools so they can brainwash boys (and girls too) into accepting an ideology that intends to emasculate men and subordinate them to women.
It doesn’t matter what you think about women’s rights, this naked attempt at social engineering is unutterably contemptible.
Feminists like Cooper are openly intent on dividing us, so they can rule us. They want to change our lives and get us to conform to their own one-sided Marxist-socialist-communist political position.
Yvette Cooper is one of the truly dangerous feminist activists who have infiltrated the British Labour Party (Harriet Harman is another, and there are several more), who are driving a Marxist agenda under the guise of feminism (which is an historical component of Marxism), passing itself off as liberal socialism (i.e. equality and freedom).
Both Marxism and feminism are intent on destroying marriage as an institution. They want to control children’s education so as to instal their ideology into society and create the ‘legalised community of women’ that Marx wrote about in the 1848 Communist Manifesto. It is there for anyone to see:
Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. … The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement [Marriage] vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.
And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, &c.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.
But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus… He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production… For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial…
Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that [Capitalist] system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private
Bringing society under socialist control by breaking down marriage and destroying the normal family structure, overturning the natural authority of the father (which is the true meaning of patriarchy), and bringing children into common care and control, so they can be indoctrinated into the party line from childhood, is the game that Cooper and her ilk are playing.
Those sincere and well-meaning people who espouse feminism in the belief that it is an equality movement, are embracing the utter disruption of our western way of life, and the would do well to look more deeply into what they are supporting.
Feminism is neither about equality, nor about women. It is a poisonous creed that is using women – setting them against men: using children cynically and steadily breaking down the fibre of our society. It has infiltrated us, so as to destroy us. That is the poisonous creed the likes of Yvette Cooper are promulgating – if you are a feminist, that is the creed you are embracing and spreading.
If you really do have a sincere belief in fairness and equality of opportunity for all, as I do, and as most right-minded people do, you will quickly come to see that this divisive, toxic Marxist ideology is enslaving you: it is intent on enslaving us all using the age-old technique of divide and rule.
Feminism is emphatically not about freedom – of opportunity, expression, or anything else, like all socialist-communist experiments of the 20th Century – all of which failed because human nature wants to be free, it is a mentally and physically enslaving thing.
Wake up. Break off the shackles of the false rhetoric, and free your mind. That is increasingly what men (and women) across the developed world are doing. They have woken up and smelled the coffee. Try it. It is truly liberating.