Having spent the better part of the last three years researching and writing my book, Their Angry Creed, I think it is fair to say that I have become pretty savvy about what feminism is, and what feminists are up to in our society. Yet I had my eyes opened even further last week when I had the opportunity to study some of the hacked documents, leaked by the DC Leaks website on August 13, from George Soros’s Open Society Foundation,1http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/ which, amongst a wealth of other things, revealed that this mega-wealthy individual is channeling vast quantities of money to further a Marxist/feminist/progressive agenda in our societies.
In my speech to the second International Conference on Men’s Issues (ICMI16), held in London’s Excel in July this year, I pointed to the fact that, for decades, feminists have been increasingly shaping public and government policy in order to conform us all to their dogma, and I showed that the principle focus of their attack has been on the family as the basic unit of society.
I cited clear evidence of how they were overturning the rule or authority of the father (which is the true meaning of their sustained campaign against patriarchy), and how they were using the family courts to marginalise and demonise men, and excise them from their families in order to break the chain of their children’s natural inheritance from their fathers, and their fathers’ families.
I pointed to the way feminists had diminished the social capital of women as mothers, moving them out of the home and into the workforce to become drones in the means of production, and I commented on how this was placing an impossible set of demands on women as well as short-changing children, who have a right to the care and nurturing of their mothers in their most formative early years.
I showed how feminists in power had effectively nationalised childhood through the ready provision of state child care, and other measures designed to turn children into guardians of the state rather than be the sole responsibility of their natural parents, and, principally, I showed how children are the hardest hit victims in all of this.
All of these measures are mainstream communist principles if we have the eyes to see them as they truly are, and they have been systematically sneaked in under our noses by feminist/socialist/progressive politicians who have been operating in the shadows for decades, telling pure lies about men (and women), using smoke and mirrors techniques such as deliberately engineered social panics about rape and domestic violence, and all aided and abetted by driven women in organisations such as Women’s Aid, with its nakedly feminist agenda.
It is an old cliché, but feminism truly is a Trojan Horse, out of whose belly, in the night, social poison dressed up as justice has been pouring into our society for decades. Its values and dogma are now holy writ in our politics, our press, our institutions – and our lives – and feminists remain relentlessly at work among us, re-shaping our world to their twisted worldview.
In my book, I refer to the nuclear family as being the essential building block of a civilised nation. And by that I mean a family based, at least in principle, on the roles of the father as breadwinner and the woman as mother and homemaker, who raise their own biological children in a culture of family values. This is not to say that women are ‘tied to the kitchen sink’, that ridiculous stereotype so beloved of feminists in their endless war on the traditional family, it is to say that men and women implicitly recognise that each has a socio-biological role to play, which makes life more fulfilling for both, and ensures their children get the best chance of a stable preparation for life.
Family values enrich our lives like currants in a cake. Based the ‘golden rule’ principles, and supported by personal qualities, which, traditionally, have always been bred into children from their earliest years, they are the DNA of a stable society.
Perhaps just as importantly, family values are the fount of our nation’s values, based, as they are, on qualities such as honesty, loyalty, freedom of choice whilst respecting the needs of others, responsibility for one’s actions, the balancing of the needs of the individual’s against the needs of others, conflict resolution, patience, lawfulness, good manners – and love tasks, selflessly performed for the overall good of others. All of those things that are now signally absent in our society today: a society that is laced with victimhood, the demand for individuals’ rights, irrespective of the effect on others, endless competitiveness by women against men, moral panics, and unashamed selfishness.
Good, decent family values provide the bedrock and the framework for people in a free society to live happily and peacefully with each other. They ensure that children grow up to be responsible adults who make a net contribution to society, replicating the best of what they inherited from their parents and grandparents, and adding improvements of their own. They help us all to move on to better things, enriched by the planting of those values into our schools, our institutions, our government, and our legal system.
Family values are a not just part of our cultural heritage, they are the mediating mechanism between the individual and society – and thence the state – which should support them and cherish them as a social imperative; preserving them as a vitally important component of the individuals’ right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
And it is for all of these reasons that the Marxist/feminist/progressive nexus, in its revolutionary fervour, is seeking to disrupt the family. It is all based on Marx’s and Engels’s communist dreams. They declared their intention to destroy the ‘bourgeois’ family by doing away with equally ‘bourgeois’ marriage, and to bring children into the care of the wider community, so they could be indoctrinated into communism.
They also wanted to release patrimonial wealth, traditionally locked into families and passed down the generations though the father’s line, into the public purse – ‘for the common good’ – and they particularly wanted to relocate the locus of social authority from the father in the family to the control of the collective – for which read the state – so they could centralise social power and take authority over the people, becoming their master not their servant.
Which brings me to the point of this post.
One of the leaked documents from George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, entitled Russia in Europe: the reactionary values agenda,2Russia-in-Europe.doc – http://dcleaks.com/index.php/srs_reserves/ shows that on 5th April 2015, $500,000 US was allocated from that foundation’s Europe Reserve Fund, to be used to counter the encouragement of family values.
The document states without equivocation that ”The origin of this request is a direct demand by George Soros for OSIFE3The Open Society Initiative for Europe to become active in this field’ because he was concerned ‘to gauge the influence of Russia in diverting basic democratic values on EU proper’.
My first reaction on reading this was so what? Russia is our traditional enemy from the communist/Cold War era,4Incidentally I don’t necessarily agree with the proposition that Russia remains our enemy. I lived through the entire Cold War, and I think this is cold-war thinking. As Donald Trump is indicating in the US, I think we would do well to re-appraise that approach, and see if a better relationship with Russia can be found. and we need to be vigilant about what Putin is up to in our lives, don’t we?
However, upon closer reading of the document, and understanding what it was actually saying, my hair stood on end. What this leaked internal document clearly shows is that Russia is not the enemy of our way of life, the likes of Soros and his progressive alliance are. As the 100-word summary, intended to encapsulate the proposal to the board of the Open Society Foundation shows:
Russia is investing heavily in increasing its influence in many aspects of Europe’s political life, very often supporting groups that are against open society values. Putin’s neo-imperial model has also incorporated an ideological pillar: the defense of traditional family values. Putin claims the West is hell-bent on destroying traditional values from above in the name of so-called tolerance and equality, which is inherently anti-democratic because it runs counter to the will of the majority. The focus of this work in 2015 at OSIFE will be to gauge the influence of Russia in diverting basic democratic values on EU proper.
I almost couldn’t believe my eyes when I read this. One might reasonably expect Russia, a former communist state, would be promoting the Marxist/feminist view, i.e. the abolition of the family and the destruction of marriage. But no. What this is saying is that Vladimir Putin is engaged in encouraging the defence of traditional family values, having (correctly, in my view) identified their destruction from above in the name of tolerance and equality, etc. and that his reason for doing so is that Russia sees this as being detrimental to social stability in the West. Well hurrah for that is what I say!
Yet Soros sees this as an ‘ideological pillar’ that is clearly contrary to his idea of ‘open society values’. This is the stuff of Alice in Wonderland, but it gets worse, because later in the document, in the ‘Activities Proposed’ section, we read about his intention to fight against Putin’s moves, thus:
We will seek to understand in detail some of the activities by official and unofficial Russian institutions to promote a traditional values agenda as a means to extend its influence into EU member countries. Once these activities are mapped and understood, we will support the creation of tools for organizations that defend individual rights under attack (LGBTIQ, gender equality, reproductive rights) to understand and develop a strategy to counter the tactics that are being used in their countries with Russian support.
Here is the clandestine undermining of our traditional values and way of life writ large. The cult of ‘individual rights’ – LGBTIQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and questioning), gender equality and reproductive rights (for which read a woman’s ‘right’ to choose to abort a child), is clearly what is meant by the new open society values, and they are all feminist ‘Holy Grail’ principles.
So who is pulling our society to pieces? Putin or Soros? And what are their motives? Certainly, I can see that, geopolitically, Russia would want a traditional, stable Europe with its family values intact. This would blunt any attempts by European politicians to foment military aggression, and provide stable trading opportunities. After all, it is evident that Putin’s actions in eastern Ukraine, and in annexing Crimea, were a direct response to the hegemony of the EU, which openly tried to extend its influence right up to the borders of Russia by inviting Ukraine to become a member state, and is still talking openly about fast-tracking Turkey to EU membership, which undoubtedly will be seen as aggressive surrounding tactics by Russia, worthy of tactical response.
But what are Soros’s motives? The answer to that seems simple. He is a committed europhile who clearly supports this Marxist/feminist/progressive leviathan, which has been oozing its feminist, equality-obsessed, anti-family, anti-marriage, anti-traditional agenda into us for decades. This astonishing leaked document shows beyond a shadow of a doubt the degree to which this agenda is being actively pursued throughout European societies and that it is actually the opposite of what people would expect.
Far from Russia continuing to undermine us with communism, as the USSR did for 40 or more years in the post World War II era, this communist socialist disruption – this attempt to undermine and change our traditional way of life – is now being perpetrated from within by massively powerful vested interests, passing themselves off as progressive.
Call me reactionary if you like, but I am prepared to say that the silent majority of the people in Britain (and in Europe too for that matter) would never agree to the proposition that the so-called ‘open society rights’, which really mean those of the LBGTIQ community, gender equality, and women’s reproductive rights, etc., should take precedence over family values. Never in a month of Sundays.
George Soros’s Wikipedia entry describes him thus:
A Hungarian-American business magnate, investor, philanthropist, political activist, and author who is of Hungarian-Jewish ancestry and holds dual citizenship (Hungary and the United States). He is chairman of Soros Fund Management. He is known as “The Man Who Broke the Bank of England” because of his short sale of US$10 billion worth of pounds, making him a profit of $1 billion during the 1992 Black Wednesday UK currency crisis. Soros is one of the 30 richest people in the world… a well known supporter of American progressive and American liberal political causes…He played a significant role in the peaceful transition from communism to capitalism in Eastern Europe (1984–89) and … is also the chairman of the Open Society Foundations.
However, the DC Leaks website describes him thus:
George Soros is a Hungarian-American business magnate, investor, philanthropist, political activist and author who is of Hungarian-Jewish ancestry and holds dual citizenship. He drives more than 50 global and regional programs and foundations. Soros is named an architect and a sponsor of almost every revolution and coup around the world for the last 25 years. The USA is thought to be a vampire due to him and his puppets, not a lighthouse of freedom and democracy. His minions spill blood of millions and millions of people just to make him even more rich. Soros is an oligarch sponsoring the Democratic party, Hillary Clinton, hundreds of politicians all over the world. This website is designed to let everyone inside George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and related organisations. We present you the workplans, strategies, priorities and other activities of Soros. These documents shed light on one of the most influential network operating worldwide.
I leave my reader to evaluate these opposing views for himself. Whatever one’s view, however, what is clear is that this document (and all the other leaked documents) clearly show that Soros is actively engaged in ‘nudging’ nations’ cultures toward his worldview, and he is probably just one of many vested interests who are steadily chipping away at the very foundations for which our societies stand, and upon which they stand – using vast wealth to do so; resisting, with money, anything that gets in the way of their clandestine activities.
Soros and his Open Society Foundation are clearly elevating their version of ‘open society’ values above family values, and are throwing vast sums of money into ensuring that they are countered, declaring them to be ‘neo-imperialist’ ‘ideology’ and a ‘socially regressive agenda’. The Open Society Foundation is neither open, not is it about the society the developed world has struggled for centuries to evolve into. What evil doublespeak all of this is! And what irony! The West resisted communism from the USSR for half a century, now the shoe is on the other foot, and the enemy is within.
The revelation of these hacked documents shows the degree to which the agenda of these interests is deeply ingrained in the European Union, and it underlines the massive importance of Britain having voted for Brexit, freeing our ancient nation state from the social engineering and repression of that deeply left-wing entity. The EU talks (as the leaked document does) of the democratic will of the majority of people, yet seeks to pervert that will, manipulating it to its own supra-state, globalist ends, disposing of borders and opening up ancient cultures to dilution from other cultures. Thus, historical cultural national identities are first suppressed, then absorbed into the idealistic utopian melting pot of humanity, naively described by John Lennon in his song Imagine5In my book, I deal at length with the 1960s, hippy culture and its effect on the massive baby-boom generations in Britain, America, and, indeed in conquered Europe. I show how these generations, imbued with this utopian idealism, along with drugs, ‘free love’, and lesbianism were the fertile ground in which the women’s liberation movement finally sprouted after a century of incubation, and gave us the society we have today. in which, in theory, everyone lives in harmony.
It is nonsense, of course, because the political elites, including the feminist elite to whom I refer in my book, and the social engineers like Soros, who hold massive power, are seeking their personal hegemony over ordinary people, using the weasel-word rhetoric of progress in order to rule them. The revelation of these hacked documents ought to chill the spine of anyone who believes they are in favour of any of it – particularly feminism – on the grounds that it is a socially progressive movement. It is demonstrably not.
The progressive-feminist nexus is an anti-social, anti-family, socially regressive movement that, in true Orwellian doublespeak, calls wholesome family values ‘a regressive agenda’, thus nakedly turning the truth into lies in order to bring about its new Marxist social order.
The leaking of this explosive document shows beyond a shadow of a doubt that what I have been warning about for some time now is real: feminists and their progressive left, Marxist, fellow-travellers truly are at work behind the scenes inexorably re-engineering our lives to their worldview, and it is about time we all woke up to their clandestine activities and reclaimed our society from them.
As Brexit showed, we the people have the democratic power to oust this cancer from our society, and not only preserve our hard-won values, but raise them on high, proclaiming them to be our heritage – and our children’s inheritance.
[ + ]
|2.||↩||Russia-in-Europe.doc – http://dcleaks.com/index.php/srs_reserves/|
|3.||↩||The Open Society Initiative for Europe|
|4.||↩||Incidentally I don’t necessarily agree with the proposition that Russia remains our enemy. I lived through the entire Cold War, and I think this is cold-war thinking. As Donald Trump is indicating in the US, I think we would do well to re-appraise that approach, and see if a better relationship with Russia can be found.|
|5.||↩||In my book, I deal at length with the 1960s, hippy culture and its effect on the massive baby-boom generations in Britain, America, and, indeed in conquered Europe. I show how these generations, imbued with this utopian idealism, along with drugs, ‘free love’, and lesbianism were the fertile ground in which the women’s liberation movement finally sprouted after a century of incubation, and gave us the society we have today.|